.
News Alert
Cops: Brooklyn Woman Murdered Housemate, Spread…

Elwood Budget Update: 13.3% Increase or Cut Like Crazy?

Staff, athletics, and kindergarten are all under scrutiny at Elwood's Board of Ed meeting tonight as the administration explores ways to reduce its 2011-2012 budget by $3.5 million.

It’s a tough choice for the : Keep services the same and ask taxpayers to shoulder a 13.33% tax levy. Or eliminate $3.5 million by cutting athletics, field trips, co-curricular activities – all the things that a community not only hopes for but expects from its school district – to which the Board of Education has requested.

The scary part about Elwood’s budget picture isn’t the $3.5 million, as Superintendent Peter Scordo explained at the March 3 budget workshop. It  is how limited the district is in its choices of where to cut, and how little those savings amount to. The "Budget Review andPossible Reductions" presentation is attached to this article.

For example, athletics accounts for $794,998, or 1.43% of the total budget. Field trips amount to another $53,801. Add in reductions in equipment, textbooks, workbooks, materials and supplies, and co-curricular expenses and the total equals $2,257,916 – still not enough to reach the $3.5 million goal.

But why those particular cuts?

There's More to Mandates Than Meets the Eye
As Scordo pointed out in his outline of possible reductions, nearly 45% of Elwood’s $55,633,473 budget is composed of mandated, non-negotiable costs, including health insurance, social security, contributions to the Employee Retirement System and the Teachers Retirement System.

Those are the mandates and terms that taxpayers probably hear about the most. Trustee Dan Ciccone cited other examples of unfunded mandates that the district is required to pay. For instance, transportation must be provided to all students, regardless of whether they attend public school. That means the district – and therefore, taxpayers --  must pay to transport those students who attend private schools as well.

Another big area is assessment and testing mandates. “It’s a big expense,” Ciccone said, “and there are other ways of getting the data.”  He also pointed out that the district is required to pay an architect a fee each year to go over each building even if nothing has changed.  “Every year we have to do it.”

Ciccone suggested that Scordo add these costs into the list of line items so that the public could clearly see the extent of mandated, non-negotiable items over which the district has no control.  And he suggested that the public lobby Albany and local legislators. “They’re screwing with our kids and we’ve got to stand up to that.”

Closing the Gap
“The challenge is we’re going to have to go to staff – it’s the only place left to go,” Scordo said, noting that the elimination of 18 full-time positions would equal $1,170,000 – enough to meet the $3.5 million. He cited one happy note: the addition of $312,795 to the bottom line due to changes in the Teachers Retirement System (TRS) contribution rates, an additional retiree, a reduction for one potential BOCES placement and reductions in summer school placements which were paid for by the state.  

At the next budget workshop, which will take place at 7:30 p.m. March 10 at the , Scordo said the administration will have a preliminary idea of staffing needs and possible reductions, and will be prepared to discuss the possibility of reducing full day kindergarten to half day.

“I’m not going to ask you to make a decision about full-day kindergarten next week,” he told Board members, but added that the decision would need to be made soon so that parents would be able to plan ahead.

The bigger picture was even more bleak. “It’s the year after next year that I’m concerned about,” Scordo acknnowledged. “If we cut now and a cap is imposed, and we’ve already cut to the bone, how are we going to budget for next year?”

FB April 05, 2011 at 02:36 AM
@ Paul - You are 100% correct. Also, let's look at St. Anthony's. I can bet that the administrators, teachers, custodians, etc. are not paid nearly what the public school teachers make and have to contribute way more to health benefits and retirement. I've always heard that St. Anthony's is a great school. Go figure.
But .... April 05, 2011 at 03:07 AM
@FB - 1 big difference is that Saint Anthony's has an entrance exam. And if a student does not maintain a high grade point average they are kicked out. So they are only educating the higher academic level students. An average student would not be accepted.
Steve O'Connor April 05, 2011 at 11:58 AM
I see your point. I have three daughters in the Elwood District, however, I am an ardent supporter of a tax cap. Someone has to be held accountable for a benefit and retirement system which has become unsustaneable. My family can't afford yet again a +10% increase in taxes. If enough parents become angry due to an austerity budget, perhaps the Teacher's Unions will agree to increase contribution requirements to lets say 40%.....401K. As most other working american's my retirement is what I put into it. How about health care....I pay a $50 copay everytime one of my daughter's catches a cold. I'm not complaining, just keeping it real. Why not raise copay's for for the teacher's? Let me be clear. I am not against a teacher with 20 years experience making 90,000 a year. It is the teacher's retirement system and healthcare which we can not afford. One last thought. Do we need all of the very expensive administrators we have? We have a small district, why not cap admin. salaries and consolidate? The 2% cap is coming and the School District needs to get their finacial house in order, however they need to do it. If these doomsday austerity budgets come to fruition I will move or put my kids in private school. If enough people do this, the District is toast. The costs associated with running our schools needs to be contained. If the Teacher's Union is not willing to help there may be quite a few teachers on unemployment in the next couple of years. A very concerned taxpayer
FB April 05, 2011 at 12:23 PM
@Kim - I'm sorry, I was unaware that you were the only one allowed to post on multiple threads. WHAT EXACTLY DO YOU THINK MY MOTIVES ARE? Because you disagree with me it automatically means I have some underhanded motives???? I'm glad you reposted what I said because I stand by it 100%. I have a great job and I know it!
FB April 05, 2011 at 12:59 PM
@ Kim - What would you like to know. As far as layoffs, my school is not really affected. We had such an overage of teachers that they were just put back in the classroom. Pay and benefit cuts...not really. Senioity, yes, they are trying to change that and get rid if the last in first out rule which I agree with. I have been on a childcare leave for the past year (unpaid) so if you want more info I can email my collegues. I'm amazed that you have a problem believeing that a teacher can be against this craziness. I see all sides of it as a teacher, a spouse of a private sector employee, a taxpayer, and a mother.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »