.
Feedback

Tell Us: Are Tighter Gun Control Laws Needed?

Debate flares following Connecticut elementary school shooting.

Always bubbling under the surface, the national debate on gun control has flared into the forefront of public discussion following the brutal killing of 26 people at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut Friday.

20-year-old Gunman Adam Lanza, who reportedly suffered from either a mental illness or developmental disability, took three guns--a Bushmaster .223-caliber semiautomatic assault rifle, a Glock 10 mm handgun and a Sig Sauer 9 mm handgun--from his mother's home cache before the shooting. His mother was a gun enthusiast and law enforcement believes that all five guns in her home were acquired legally and properly registered, according to The New York Times.

Support for reinstating a federal ban on assault rifles, expired in 2004, is now brewing among politicians, according to a Huffington Post report. President Barack Obama remains committed to reinstating the ban, alongside Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., NYC Mayor Mike Bloomberg, and other Democrats. Some add they also want to make it more difficult for mentally ill individuals to obtain guns.

Gun advocate organizations have largely remained reticent in the wake of the tragedy, added the Huff Po report, although Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-TX, defended the sale of assault weapons on a Fox News talk show and said that the principal at Sandy Hook Elementary School, who authorities say died trying to overtake the shooter, should herself have been armed.

We asked Patch readers for their opinion on our Facebook Page. Here's what they had to say:

"I do not like guns at all. Won't own one," wrote Michelle Lok Tyska. "But it's not the guns that are the problem it's the people wielding them. In this case. This young man was definitely mentally unstable. Him having guns in his home was no help."

"They can make the gun laws tighter, but unfortunately I don't think it will stop anything significantly. People will still find a way to get there hands on them," wrote Bevin Degley, "What needs to be done is to prohibit the sale of guns to people who have someone in there family who has a disability such as the shooter. If you look at these killers they all have a mental disability. Either they need to stop the sale to anyone who lives with the person or make it mandatory to purchase a save and provide evidence they have a safe."

Tell us your opinion in the comment section below. Are tighter gun laws needed? Will reinstating the assault weapons ban be enough? Should federal law regulate how and if guns can be stored in someone's home?

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone everyday with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Ranger Sewer December 17, 2012 at 07:11 pm
Ban the CRIMINAL and not the GUN.
Big Stevie Cool December 17, 2012 at 07:56 pm
Oklahoma Bombing proves its not the gun
Ranger Sewer December 17, 2012 at 08:34 pm
From what I see, FERTILIZER or DIESEL has not been banned yet. How about banning CARS because of all the DWI's that are on the roads that have killed more people then any Law Abiding Firearm owner? F&F killed more people then any firearm in my collection.
upole December 18, 2012 at 01:09 am
So all of the guns used were stolen from him mother's house. The gun laws in effect now require you to be 21 years of age to purchase any of them. The main point is under the law they were all stolen.
Louise December 18, 2012 at 03:27 pm
Modification is needed to our gun laws. Automatic assault weapons and mega clips belong in the hands of the military and law enforcement personnel, not to kill Bambi and Smoky the Bear. I don't want a gun ban because, based on the loose interpretation of the 2nd Amendment which was ratified in 1791, we have the right to bear arms. However, the weapons of choice today did not exist back then.
I wonder how our founding fathers would react to our America today?
Long Island Lover December 18, 2012 at 03:45 pm
Don’t be so naïve. The guns aren’t the problem. Our lack of concern for the mentally ill is the problem. You should read this story written by a mom about what she has to deal with on a daily basis. You can follow this link http://now.msn.com/i-am-adam-lanzas-mother-says-mom-of-mentally-ill-son?GT1=%2050501.
Take away the guns and an insane person will just find another way to kill. How about cars? They kill way more people every year than guns do. Bombs are easy to make. How about a Molotov Cocktail? Look at the root of the problem. Our country spends virtually nothing on mental health. We had on LI two facilities which held the mentally ill. I guess everyone got better since they have been closed for years and are now being demolished. Our schools will have two psychologists for 2500 students. Social workers typically have way too many clients to be effective. They can’t handle what they have and even if they could, they have way too much red tape to deal with, so nothing gets done. We are a nation that is so afraid of taking away a person’s rights, we‘ve made it impossible to get the mentally ill the help they need until they have crossed the line. Then, it’s off to prison which is the new mental health facility. So stop all the knee jerk reactions to gun control.
FYI December 19, 2012 at 06:17 pm
I was told today that the constant in every mass school shooting has been the shooter has been on psychotropic drugs. Is that true and if so, what are the warning signs associated with those drugs. So I did a quick check myself... http://beforeitsnews.com/2012/2012/12/psychiatric-drugs-and-mass-shootings-2441362.html
Taizo December 20, 2012 at 03:31 am
I was born developmentally disabled (PDD) you should get the mentally disabled people help!! If you take away a gun what's next a car with explosives or what??
Jim January 2, 2013 at 11:27 pm
I can't wait until they take firearms out of the hands of the mentally unstable. You won't have that collection anymore, pal.
Dad of Three January 3, 2013 at 03:46 am
Thanks, Louise, it seems that most people don't realize that muzzle-loaded muskets is what was contemplated when the Amendment was created.
Being able to hunt deer or ducks, and being able to carry a simple pistol (if you feel you need personal protection) is a reasonable derivation of that amendment. Assault weapons, or anything similarly appropriate for military forces or police forces, were not contemplated and should not be allowed for simple civilians.
Chuck Carnevale January 10, 2013 at 09:29 pm
The first step towards solving any problem is to identify the problem. Guns are not the problem, mentally unstable people capable of heineous acts are the problem. I suspect that today's trend to puy our brightest children on psychotropic drugs so that teachers and other supervisors can aviod the challenge is a major contributor.
It is refreshing to finally see people discussing the real problem. Hating guns may make some feel better, but does very little to solve the real problem.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Northport Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something